scripts/ is for repo tooling (tests runner, release, installers, CI
checks). The tool-search live tests, the toolperf A/B eval and the browser
eval benchmark are offline benchmarks that spend model budget, which is
exactly what evals/ holds; evals/browser_use already cited
scripts/toolperf_abeval as "the same pattern".
- scripts/tool_search_livetest*.py + analyze_livetest.py + LIVETEST_README
-> evals/tool_search/ (README.md); repo-root sys.path hop adjusted for
the extra directory level; gitignore now covers evals/tool_search/out*/
- scripts/toolperf_abeval/ -> evals/toolperf_abeval/
- scripts/benchmark_browser_eval.py -> evals/browser_use/
Replays the actual tool schemas captured from Epic's UE 5.8
ModelContextProtocol + AllToolsets plugins (830 tools / 52 toolsets) as
live registry tools with mocked editor responses, then benchmarks
eager vs bare-bridge vs bridge+listing at two scales (62-tool editor
subset, full 830) on Claude Opus 4.8 (1M ctx; eager at 830 does not fit
any 200K model — first call requests ~266K tokens).
Headline (full 830, mean per task, rescored): eager 8/8 at 810,578
input tokens ($4.05); bare bridge 16/16 at 160,844 ($0.80); listing
16/16 at 257,264 ($1.29). Frontier model erases the accuracy gap in
every mode; cost is the differentiator. At 62 tools eager wins on cost
— consistent with the auto-threshold design.
Also parameterizes livetest harness model + listing_max_tokens via
env/args (TS_UE_MODEL, TS_UE_SCALE, TS_UE_MODES, TS_UE_LISTING_MAX).
ouyangbo
teknium1