cf60ebbdfd264c3fc067b9e3230df8752c50d2ec
4 Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
39975613b1 |
test: prune wave 2 + speed fixes — 28,106 → 19,757 test functions, suite wall 315s → 294s
Second, deeper pass over tools/gateway/hermes_cli plus first pass over the trees wave 1 missed (acp, acp_adapter, skills, computer_use, docker, dashboard, conformance, monitoring, secret_sources, hermes_state, providers). Same rubric as wave 1 (AGENTS.md test policy); security, alternation/caching invariants, issue-number regressions, and E2E kept. Real test-quality fixes found and rooted out along the way: - tests/tools/test_command_guards.py made real auxiliary-LLM HTTPS calls (DEFAULT_CONFIG smart-approval leaked in) — pinned approval mode=manual via autouse fixture: 17.4s → 0.4s. - test_model_switch_custom_providers.py / test_user_providers_model_switch.py silently probed live provider catalogs (~2s/test) — stubbed cached_provider_model_ids/provider_model_ids/fetch_api_models. - test_telegram_noise_filter.py: 15-platform copy-paste matrix over shared gateway.run logic → 3 representative platforms (55s → 3.9s). - test_gateway_shutdown.py: stop()'s 5s interrupt-deadline loop spun on MagicMock agents — interrupt.side_effect now clears _running_agents (22s → 1.0s). - test_gateway_inactivity_timeout.py poll-harness timings shrunk 3-5x (24s → 1.1s); test_mcp_stability.py backoff/SIGTERM-grace sleeps patched (15.4s → 2.5s); test_async_delegation.py negative-drain wait 5s → 0.5s. - test_telegram_init_deadline.py: loop-block margin restored to 1.0s with rationale comment — the watchdog-dump assertion needs the loop blocked well past deadline+grace under parallel load (flaked once in the 40-worker verification run at a 0.2s margin). Verification: full hermetic suite via scripts/run_tests.sh — 2,438 files, 21,718 tests passed, 0 failed, 293.9s wall. Suite totals vs original baseline: 46,820 → 19,757 test functions (−57.8%), wall 583.5s → 293.9s (−50%), subprocess CPU 13,564s → 11,623s. |
||
|
|
5600105478 |
refactor(gateway): migrate slack/dingtalk/whatsapp/matrix/feishu/telegram/wecom/email/sms adapters to bundled plugins
Salvage of PR #41284 onto current main. Relocates the last 9 inline messaging adapters (+ satellites: telegram_network, feishu_comment/_rules/meeting_invite, wecom_crypto, wecom_callback) from gateway/platforms/ into self-contained bundled plugins under plugins/platforms/<x>/, discovered via the platform registry. Strips the per-platform core touchpoints from gateway/run.py, gateway/config.py, hermes_cli/gateway.py, hermes_cli/setup.py, and tools/send_message_tool.py. Carries forward the migration fixes (explicit enabled:false honored, get_connected_platforms forces discovery, plugin is_connected via gateway.get_env_value, logs --component gateway matches plugins.platforms.*, matrix hidden on Windows). Additionally ports config keys main added since the PR base: the matrix plugin's _apply_yaml_config now also covers allowed_users, ignore_user_patterns, process_notices, and session_scope (the inline gateway/config.py matrix block gained these in the 1340 commits the PR sat open; they would otherwise have been silently dropped on deletion). |
||
|
|
ab0a6270c3 |
fix(slack): align thread_ts check with is_thread_reply invariant (Copilot #15464)
Two findings from Copilot's review on #15464, both addressed: 1. ``event.get("thread_ts")`` truthy vs ``event_thread_ts != ts``: the new channel branch treated ANY truthy ``thread_ts`` as a real thread reply, but three lines below ``is_thread_reply`` is defined with the stricter ``event_thread_ts and event_thread_ts != ts`` invariant. If Slack ever ships a payload where ``thread_ts == ts`` on a thread root, the stricter check would treat it as a top-level message for the ``is_thread_reply`` path but as a thread reply for session keying — divergent behaviour. Aligned this branch to the same ``and event_thread_ts_raw != ts`` invariant. 2. ``test_top_level_reply_to_id_stays_none_when_shared`` docstring had the ternary logic backwards ("None != ts → reply_to_message_id IS set"). The code reads ``reply_to_message_id = thread_ts if thread_ts != ts else None`` — with ``thread_ts = None``, the condition is True so the expression evaluates to ``thread_ts`` itself (None), meaning the reply stays un-threaded. The test asserted the correct end-state; only the explanatory docstring was wrong. Rewrote the docstring to match the actual code flow, with the note that Copilot caught the reversal. 7/7 tests still pass. No behaviour change for the existing test_thread_reply_scopes_by_thread_even_when_shared case because ``event_thread_ts_raw = "1700000000.000000"`` and ``ts = "1700000000.000005"`` are distinct — the new ``!= ts`` guard is a no-op there. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
133e0271e2 |
fix(slack): scope top-level channel messages by channel-only when reply_in_thread=false (#15421)
Top-level Slack channel messages previously fell back to the message's
own ``ts`` as a synthetic ``thread_ts``:
thread_ts = event.get("thread_ts") or ts # ts fallback for channels
That value flows into ``build_source(thread_id=thread_ts)`` at
line 1247. The gateway session store keys sessions by
``(platform, channel_id, thread_id)``, so every top-level channel
message ended up on a unique session. Operators who set
``reply_in_thread: false`` in ``config.yaml`` expected all top-level
channel messages to share one session (the whole point of that flag)
— instead each one spawned a fresh conversation with no context
carry-over.
### Fix
Three explicit cases in the channel branch:
| event.thread_ts | reply_in_thread | thread_ts for session keying |
|---|---|---|
| non-null (real thread reply) | either | event.thread_ts |
| null (top-level) | true (default) | ts (legacy: own-thread sessions) |
| null (top-level) | false | **None** (shared channel session) |
The outbound-reply gate at line 1264 (``reply_to_message_id =
thread_ts if thread_ts != ts else None``) still works correctly in
all three cases without further changes: ``None != ts`` is True, so
shared-channel top-level messages don't get their reply threaded
either — matching the operator's ``reply_in_thread=false`` intent
end-to-end.
Genuine thread replies still scope per-thread under both modes so
multi-person threaded conversations can't collide with unrelated
channel chatter.
### Tests (7 new in ``tests/gateway/test_slack_channel_session_scope.py``)
All drive the real ``SlackAdapter._handle_slack_message`` code path
(not a re-implementation) via the standard pytest fixture pattern
used by ``tests/gateway/test_slack.py``. Messages @mention the bot
so the mention gate doesn't drop them — the tests are specifically
about what happens once the handler decides to emit a ``MessageEvent``.
* ``TestChannelSessionScopeDefault`` (2 cases):
- Explicit ``reply_in_thread: true`` keeps ``thread_id = ts``
(legacy behaviour — regression guard)
- Unset config behaves like ``reply_in_thread: true`` (pins the
default)
* ``TestChannelSessionScopeShared`` (3 cases):
- ``reply_in_thread: false`` + top-level → ``thread_id is None``
(the #15421 bug 1 fix)
- ``reply_to_message_id is None`` in the same case (no threaded
outbound reply)
- Genuine thread reply still scopes per-thread when shared mode is
on — only TOP-LEVEL messages collapse to the channel session
* ``TestThreadReplyAlwaysScopesByThread`` (2 parametrised cases):
- Thread replies get ``thread_id = event.thread_ts`` regardless of
``reply_in_thread`` — critical invariant for multi-thread
channels; a regression here would leak per-thread context across
threads
**Regression guard verified**: reverted the else-branch to the legacy
``thread_ts = event.get("thread_ts") or ts`` one-liner;
``test_top_level_maps_to_none_when_reply_in_thread_false`` correctly
failed (asserts ``thread_id is None`` but got ``"1700000000.000003"``).
Restored → 182 slack tests pass (175 existing + 7 new).
Scope: this fixes #15421 bug 1 only. Bug 2 (sessions.json not
persisting across compression) lives elsewhere in the session
manager and is left for a separate diff.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|