* feat(skill_manage): operations[] batch — several ops on one skill, atomic with rollback (memory-tool pattern); staged as ONE pending write under the approval gate
* refactor(skill_manage): operations[] IS the interface — single op = list of one (maintainer-directed); flat fields unadvertised handler compat; delete = sole-op routing
* guard(skill_manage): reject intra-batch same-file clobbers — double write/remove per path, full rewrite after an earlier SKILL.md edit; patch chains stay legal
* refactor(skill_manage): name-per-op — the call IS the operations array; cross-skill batches with all-touched-skills rollback
* guard(skill_manage): unify the intra-batch conflict guard — any destructive op on an already-touched file is rejected, with path normalization
Aggressive live testing found three holes in the two-part guard:
patch-then-write and patch-then-remove on the same supporting file
silently discarded the patch, and './references/x.md' //-style path
spellings slipped past the duplicate-write check. One rule now covers
the class: a destructive op (write_file/remove_file/full rewrite) on a
(skill, normalized-path) any earlier op touched is rejected pre-effect;
additive patches stay legal, so patch chains and write-then-patch still
work. Tests cover all three holes plus the pre-effect assertion.
Teknium