The reachability claim that single-process multi-profile leakage is desktop-
only is incomplete. gateway/run.py:_profile_runtime_scope shows a SECOND such
runtime: the multiplexed gateway (gateway.multiplex_profiles) serves every
profile from one process, scoping each inbound turn with the same
set_hermes_home_override ContextVar the desktop uses (and the /p/<profile>/
URL prefix). The M1 (import-time path globals) and M2 (thread/executor
context) leaks are reachable there identically.
- tests/gateway/test_multiplex_credential_isolation.py: add a class driving the
skills-dir + cache-dir resolvers and a propagated worker thread under the
real _profile_runtime_scope, asserting each resolves the active profile. Sits
beside the existing credential-isolation proofs for the same topology.
- Correct the inline comments in model_tools/run_agent/async_delegation/
rich_sent_store to name both runtimes (desktop tui_gateway AND the
multiplexed gateway) instead of implying desktop is the only surface.
(ACP runs one agent per subprocess and the kanban dispatcher Popens
'hermes -p <profile>' children, so neither is an in-process multi-profile
surface; desktop + multiplexed gateway are the two confirmed ones.)
Erosika
96aafecadd