search_catalog admitted every document with BM25 score > 0 and then padded
to `limit`. BM25 sums over the tokens a document shares with the query, so
on a 300-tool catalog "send gmail email" returned five incident tools that
shared only "email", and the discriminating word ("gmail", in no document)
had no say. The model read those as the answer.
Admission is now the query's rarest token: a document is a result only if it
contains the query token with the highest IDF, the one that names the intent.
Common verbs ("send", "read", "create") sit in dozens of documents and never
gate; vendor and object words ("gmail", "github", "incident") do. A token no
document carries admits nothing, and the existing empty-group hint tells the
model to retry without it. The name-substring fallback is deleted: it admitted
tools that matched no query token at all.
Result descriptions are clipped at 500 characters instead of 400. Over 353
vendor tool descriptions, 500 keeps 91% whole and every first sentence
(first-sentence max 329); 400 kept 82%.
Measured on the live 311-tool catalog with 25 hand-labelled queries:
precision@5 0.18 -> 0.43, wrong names returned 102 -> 66, false positives on
absent intents 17 -> 13. Live before/after: "send gmail email" went from five
betterstack tools to an empty group with the retry hint; "linear create issue"
and "betterstack incident" are unchanged.
11 KiB
title, sidebar_position
| title | sidebar_position |
|---|---|
| Tool Search | 95 |
Tool Search
When you have many MCP servers or non-core plugin tools attached to a session, their JSON schemas can consume a substantial fraction of the context window on every turn — even when only a few of them are relevant to what the user actually asked for.
Tool Search is Hermes' opt-in progressive-disclosure layer for that problem. When activated, MCP and plugin tools are replaced in the model-visible tools array by three bridge tools, and the model loads each specific tool's schema on demand.
:::info Built-in Hermes tools never defer
The tools that make up Hermes' core capability set (terminal,
read_file, write_file, patch, search_files, todo, memory,
browser_*, web_search, web_extract, clarify, execute_code,
delegate_task, session_search, and the rest of
_HERMES_CORE_TOOLS) are always loaded directly. Only MCP tools and
non-core plugin tools are eligible for deferral.
:::
How it works
When Tool Search activates for a turn, the model sees three new tools in place of the deferred ones:
tool_search(queries, limit?) — search the deferred-tool catalog (one or more queries)
tool_describe(names) — load the full schemas for one or more tools
tool_call(name, arguments) — invoke a deferred tool
A typical interaction looks like:
Model: tool_search(["create a github issue", "send a slack message"])
→ { results: [ { query: "create a github issue",
matches: ["mcp_github_create_issue", ...] },
{ query: "send a slack message",
matches: ["mcp_slack_post_message", ...] } ],
tools: { mcp_github_create_issue: { description: "...",
required: ["title"], ... },
mcp_slack_post_message: { ... } } }
Model: tool_describe(["mcp_github_create_issue", "mcp_slack_post_message"])
→ { tools: { mcp_github_create_issue: { parameters: { ... } },
mcp_slack_post_message: { parameters: { ... } } } }
Model: tool_call("mcp_github_create_issue", { title: "...", body: "..." })
→ { ok: true, issue_number: 42 }
Each query in a tool_search call is searched independently against the
same catalog (limit applies per query); the per-query groups carry tool
names only, while the shared tools map holds each matched tool's
description and required parameter names once. Queries are stemmed, so
"issues" finds create_issue. Each query group that returns no matches
includes an available_sources summary of the connected servers so a lexical
miss is not mistaken for a missing capability.
tool_describe resolves every requested name in one call; unknown names
are reported in not_found without failing the rest of the batch.
When the model invokes tool_call, Hermes unwraps the bridge and
dispatches the underlying tool exactly as if the model had called it
directly. Pre-tool-call hooks, guardrails, approval prompts, and
post-tool-call hooks all run against the real tool name — not against
tool_call. The activity feed in the CLI and gateway also unwraps so you
see the underlying tool, not the bridge.
When does it activate?
Tool Search uses tiered disclosure: the presence of any deferrable (MCP/plugin) tool activates the bridge; what scales with catalog size is how much of the catalog stays visible, not whether schemas defer.
| Tier | Condition | What the model sees |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | No MCP/plugin tools | Every tool eager, no bridge. Pass-through. |
| 1 | Deferred catalog's listing fits the budget | Bridge + a skills-style manifest of every deferred tool (name + short description, degrading to names-only when over budget). Degradation is per server: when one oversized server (Cloudflare) is attached alongside small ones (Linear), the small servers keep their per-tool listings and only the oversized server collapses to a summary line. |
| 2 | Per-tool listing exceeds the budget even names-only for every server (e.g. Cloudflare's flat API surface alone: ~3,300 tools whose names are ~32K tokens) | Bare bridge + a one-line-per-server summary (server name + tool count), so the model knows which domains are reachable; individual tools are discoverable only through tool_search. |
The listing budget is min(threshold_pct% of context, listing_max_tokens).
The decision is re-evaluated every time the tools array is built, so
adding or removing MCP servers mid-session moves the session between
tiers on the next assembly.
Configuration
tools:
tool_search:
enabled: auto # auto (default), on, or off
threshold_pct: 5 # listing budget as a percentage of context
search_default_limit: 5
max_search_limit: 25
listing: auto # embed a grouped name+description catalog manifest
listing_max_tokens: 4000
| Key | Default | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
enabled |
auto |
auto/on activate whenever at least one deferrable tool exists; off disables entirely (everything stays eager). auto is currently an alias of on — it is reserved for a future mode that inlines schemas when they fit the context and defers only when they don't. Pin on or off if you want today's behavior guaranteed across upgrades. |
threshold_pct |
5 |
Listing budget as a percentage of the active model's context length. Range 0–100. |
search_default_limit |
5 |
Hits returned per query when the model calls tool_search without a limit. |
max_search_limit |
25 |
Hard upper bound the model can request via limit (per query). Range 1–50. |
listing |
auto |
Embed a skills-style manifest of every deferred tool (name + first sentence of its description, ≤60 chars, grouped by MCP server) in the tool_search bridge description. auto includes it when it fits the budget (falling back to names-only, then to the tier-2 server summary); on/off force either way. |
listing_max_tokens |
4000 |
Absolute cap on the embedded listing, regardless of context size. Range 200–60000. Large catalogs degrade to names-only or per-server summaries, keeping full schemas available through search. |
Per-call array caps are internal safety bounds, not configuration. Over-cap calls return an error so the model can retry with a smaller batch.
Why the listing exists
Without it, deferred capabilities are invisible — live benchmarking showed
models substituting visible core tools (running gh in the terminal instead
of searching for the deferred GitHub tool) or declaring a capability
nonexistent instead of calling tool_search. The listing applies the skills
pattern to tools: every capability stays discoverable by name at all times,
while full parameter schemas remain deferred. If the model sees the exact
tool name in the listing, it can skip tool_search and go straight to
tool_describe, saving a round trip.
You can also flip the legacy boolean shape:
tools:
tool_search: true # equivalent to {enabled: auto}
When NOT to use it
Tool Search trades a fixed per-turn token cost (the three bridge tool
schemas plus the catalog listing) and at least one extra round trip on
cold tools (describe → call) for the savings on the deferred schemas.
At tier 1 the listing keeps every capability visible, so the discovery
round trip usually disappears — the model goes straight to
tool_describe. Live benchmarking showed the listing mode matching
eager loading's task success while costing less than the bare bridge.
If you want the old always-eager behavior for a small toolset, set
enabled: off.
Trade-offs that don't go away
These come from the prompt-cache integrity invariant — they are inherent to any progressive-disclosure design, not specific to this implementation:
- One extra round trip on cold tools. The first time the model needs a deferred tool, it spends one or two extra model calls to find and load the schema. The token savings on the static side are real, but a portion is paid back at runtime.
- No cache benefit on deferred schemas. A loaded
tool_describeresult enters the conversation history (so it does get cached on subsequent turns) but it never benefits from the system-prompt cache prefix. - No provider-native validation for deferred schemas.
tool_describelets the model read a deferred tool's schema, but the provider still sees only the generictool_call.argumentsobject. Hermes therefore coerces and validates the underlying arguments locally before dispatch; the concrete tool or MCP server remains responsible for schemas Hermes cannot safely validate, such as malformed schemas or external references. - Model-quality dependence. Tool Search assumes the model can write a reasonable search query for the tool it wants. Smaller models do this less well; the published Anthropic numbers (49% → 74% on Opus 4 with vs. without tool search) show the upside but also that ~26 points of accuracy is still retrieval failure.
- Toolset edits invalidate cache. Adding or removing a tool mid- session changes the bridge tools' descriptions (which include the count of deferred tools) and the catalog, so the prompt cache is invalidated. This is the same trade-off as any toolset edit.
Implementation details
- Retrieval: BM25 over tokenized tool name, source name (the MCP
server or plugin toolset the tool belongs to, so searching
"linear"finds that server's tools even when a tool's own name doesn't carry the service), description, and parameter names, with Snowball stemming (English) applied to both the index and the query so morphological variants match ("issues" findscreate_issue). A tool is a result only if it contains the query's rarest token (the one in the fewest tool documents, so the word that names the intent:gmail,github,incident, notsendorcreate). A query whose rarest token appears in no tool returns an empty group with the connected sources and a retry hint, instead oflimittools that share one common word. - Parallel execution unwraps the bridge. The batch planner decides
concurrency on the underlying tool of a
tool_call, not on the literal bridge name — so an MCP server opted in viasupports_parallel_tool_calls: truekeeps its concurrency when its tools are called through the bridge, andtool_search/tool_describelookups batch concurrently like any read-only tool. - Catalog is stateless across turns. It rebuilds from the current
tool-defs list every assembly — no session-keyed
Map. This avoids the class of bug where a stored catalog drifts out of sync with the live tool registry. - The catalog is scoped to the session's toolsets.
tool_search,tool_describe, andtool_callonly ever see and invoke tools the session was actually granted. A subagent, kanban worker, or gateway session restricted to a subset of toolsets cannot use the bridge to discover or call a tool outside that subset — the deferred catalog is the deferrable slice of the session's own enabled/disabled toolsets, not the whole process registry. - No JS sandbox. Hermes uses the simpler "structured tools" mode (search / describe / call as plain functions). The JS-sandbox "code mode" some other implementations offer is a large surface area; we skip it.
See also
tools/tool_search.py— the implementationtests/tools/test_tool_search.py— the regression suite- The
openclaw-tool-search-reportPDF in the original implementation PR for the research that shaped the design